International Journal of Advances in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJASEAT)
.
Follow Us On :
current issues
Volume-12,Issue-1  ( Jan, 2024 )
Past issues
  1. Volume-12,Issue-1  ( Jan, 2024 )
  2. Volume-11,Issue-4  ( Oct, 2023 )
  3. Volume-11,Issue-3  ( Jul, 2023 )
  4. Volume-11,Issue-2  ( Apr, 2023 )
  5. Volume-11,Issue-1  ( Jan, 2023 )
  6. Volume-10,Issue-4  ( Oct, 2022 )
  7. Volume-10,Issue-3  ( Jul, 2022 )
  8. Volume-10,Issue-2  ( Apr, 2022 )
  9. Volume-10,Issue-1  ( Jan, 2022 )
  10. Volume-9,Issue-4  ( Oct, 2021 )

Statistics report
Apr
Submitted Papers : 80
Accepted Papers : 10
Rejected Papers : 70
Acc. Perc : 12%
  Journal Paper


Paper Title :
Can we Ignore Pressure Drop in Catalytic Fixed- Bed Reactors?

Author :Selahattin Gultekin

Article Citation :Selahattin Gultekin , (2018 ) " Can we Ignore Pressure Drop in Catalytic Fixed- Bed Reactors? " , International Journal of Advances in Science, Engineering and Technology(IJASEAT) , pp. 44-46, Volume-6, Issue-1, Spl. Iss-2

Abstract : In catalytic fixed-bed reactors, which is known as work-horse of chemical industry, one can experience a significant pressure drop. Ignoring such a pressure drop may end up with unexpected reactor performance. In this simulation study, we considered two differential equations, one coming from mole balance, and the other from Ergun Equation. Namely, 􀯗􀮿 􀯗􀯐 = 􀝎􀮺′ (mole balance) 􀯗􀯉 􀯗􀯭 = − 􀯀 􀰘􀯚􀳎􀮽􀳛 􁉀􀬵􀬿􀰝 􀰝􀰯 􁉁 􀵤􀬵􀬹􀬴(􀬵􀬿􀰝)􀰓 􀮽􀳛 + 1.75􀜩􀵨(Ergun Equation) These two differential equations are solved simultaneously for a 2nd-order gas phase reaction with no mole changes using MATLAB package program. Parameters that changed were CA0 (initial concentration), k (specific reaction rate), v0 (initial volumetric flow rate of gas), and α (a constant which is function of particle diameter, bed porosity and viscosity). The following simulation results are obtained and only conversions versus volumetric flow rates are shown graphically in the main text. The rest of the results are just mentioned in words. Findings are: 1) Whenvo goes up, conversion, X, goes down for both with and without pressure drop. Conversion is less with pressure drop than the case when ΔP=0. 2) When kincreases, the effect of ΔPon conversion is much more pronounced. 3) WhenCA0 increases, the effect of ΔPon conversion is much more pronounced. 4) When α goes up,ΔP goes up too, hence the conversion is less for the same catalytic bed. Keywords: Packed bed reactors, Pressure drop, Reactor simulation, catalytic reactors

Type : Research paper

Published : Volume-6, Issue-1, Spl. Iss-2


DOIONLINE NO - IJASEAT-IRAJ-DOIONLINE-11654   View Here

Copyright: © Institute of Research and Journals

| PDF |
Viewed - 30
| Published on 2018-05-14
   
   
IRAJ Other Journals
IJASEAT updates
Volume-11,Issue-4 (Oct,2023)
The Conference World

JOURNAL SUPPORTED BY